On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Peter Robinson (pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >> >> >>> FTBFS packages need: >> >>> >> >>> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things >> >>> still have earlier dist tags >> >> >> > [snip] >> >> Nevertheless, as far as I can see there is nothing to do wrt FTBFS for >> >> F20. >> > >> > The following repoquery shows a number of packages that still have .fc17 >> > disttags in rawhide and have likely been failing in mass rebuilds: >> >> your better off using koji to query the builds tagged as it gives you >> the source package named. >> >> $ koji list-tagged --latest f20 | grep fc1[4-8] > > Actually, now that I re-read what we did before, for F-20 we'd block things > that have failed to build since *before* F-18, i.e., those with fc17 or > earlier dist tags. I thought that originally but then fc18 will be going EOL just after fc20 goes gold and hence I thought it was fc18, doesn't matter either way I suppose. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
