Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:

> FTBFS packages need:
> 
> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things
> still have earlier dist tags

There is no such bug, therefore I checked whether any package from
http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f18-failures.html
was also in
http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f20-failed.html
which is not the case (unless my script-fu was wrong).

> None of this is in the SOP, so I don't know if Till did it. (And it's my
> fault for not getting around to documenting it yet.)

I believe there are two SOPs (one for orphans, one for FTBFS).
Nevertheless, as far as I can see there is nothing to do wrt FTBFS for
F20.

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux