-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/15/2013 09:40 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> I want increased participation in the creation of Fedora, which >> is a product with a defined set of software shipped as default. >> I'm also happy with people working to make it practical to use >> Fedora as the basis for derived products (such as the spins and >> remixes), providing that they don't compromise the product that >> we're producing. > > I feel that people mostly say "fedora is for testing". It is > somewhat supported by responses to upgrade problems to a new > version which invariable are along the lines of "we don't support > that upgrade path/method". > > We can't tell people to re-install from scratch every 6 months. > What we need is an "apt-get dist-upgrade" equivalent. > I think your information is out of date. For the last two releases, we've had the excellent 'fedup' tool that performs a supported distribution upgrade, similar (but better than) 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. I strongly suggest taking a look. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIM4zMACgkQeiVVYja6o6PqgQCgqiOXDD2FjM9OxLtiB7dwPR7Y MXIAnjGGBNUOV1HPNbtmHcaMJ6hQpq1X =rZHt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
