On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:23 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wasn't aware Debian already exported a directory for this. (But > "/javascripts", really?) It would be nice if they wrote that into > their policy. I was slightly wrong: it's "/javascript" (singular). I couldn't find any formal Debian packaging policy for this, but the alias is set here: http://sources.debian.net/src/javascript-common/latest/javascript-common.conf > I wasn't aware Debian already exported a directory for this. (But > "/javascripts", really?) It would be nice if they wrote that into > their policy. Agreed! > The httpd maintainer would really prefer if we didn't use something > that could potentially conflict as easily as "/javascripts" though. > Not sure if "Debian does it" is a good enough reason to override > that... I just read over http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553173 , which makes me wonder if this URL is indeed going to cause problems or even change altogether. I've emailed the Debian pkg-javascript-devel list for clarification. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2013-August/005888.html - Ken -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
