On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:23 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth > <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Debian already uses /usr/share/javascript for this purpose, and it >> would be really nice if we both could coordinate on getting some >> upstream support for this in certain cases. I'm very strongly -1 >> against pointless Fedoraisms here. > > Speaking of Fedoraisms, could we please serve Javascripts through > "/javascripts" ? Debian already has a long precedent of doing this. > I'm concerned that if Fedora invents "_sysassets", we're setting > ourselves up to make the upstream advocacy task that you mentioned > much harder. I wasn't aware Debian already exported a directory for this. (But "/javascripts", really?) It would be nice if they wrote that into their policy. We still need something for CSS frameworks and such, but maybe we could drop the underscore and have: /sysassets/ -> for CSS, theming, etc. /javascripts/ -> for JS The httpd maintainer would really prefer if we didn't use something that could potentially conflict as easily as "/javascripts" though. Not sure if "Debian does it" is a good enough reason to override that... > Speaking as a web app package maintainer, I think this policy has > great intentions, and I think there's advantages to following Debian's > URL precedent. -T.C. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
