Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 30.07.2013 11:35, schrieb Ian Malone:
> This is the price you pay for having updated versions of libraries
> with security fixes and functionality, and it's why Linux
> distributions use open source (and one reason non OS software is
> tricky), provided the library API hasn't changed you just rebuild
> against the newer library. The original developer doesn't need to know
> what version you're building against. Alternatively if there's a
> vulnerability in an old zlib or libxml (not unheard of so far as I
> know) 

there is a reason i mentoined libxml
https://www.google.at/search?q=libxml2+CVE

http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2013-1969
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2013-2877

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux