Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In the OS/App differentiation, you are expecting each is coming from a different source.
> Apps are either boxed, or coming from a project.
> The app provider should fix their version of libxml, and the OS provider should fix their version of libxml

which is the definition of "fundamentally flawed"
period



Lets disagree here. I don't believe it is fundamentally flawed.

It seems you are expecting every software developer in the world to accept the versions that a Fedora packager has selected for a release without regards to functionality or changes being exposed. No wonder it it becomes impossible to run any app "on " Fedora for any length of time.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux