Re: Obsoleting ConsoleKit once and for all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 30.07.13 16:28, Christoph Wickert (christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Sun, 28.07.13 13:24, Christoph Wickert (christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > 
> > > and by pcmamfm and thunar for
> > > handling permissions of removable devices.
> > 
> > I don't know what "pcmamfm" and "thunar" are, but why would they use
> > ConsoleKit for that? Can you elaborate?
> 
> thunar and pcmanfm are file managers and require ConsoleKit for handling
> removable storage.

Why would they do that? That's between udisks and udev, CK isn't really
involved there...

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux