On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:28:55 +0200 Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > On Sun, 28.07.13 13:24, Christoph Wickert > > (christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > and by pcmamfm and thunar for > > > handling permissions of removable devices. > > > > I don't know what "pcmamfm" and "thunar" are, but why would they use > > ConsoleKit for that? Can you elaborate? > > thunar and pcmanfm are file managers and require ConsoleKit for > handling removable storage. I'm traveling right now so don't have time to look, but are you sure this is still the case for Thunar? I see no deps, no ck-* functions, and everything seems to work fine here with no ConsoleKit installed. I'll try and investigate more in the next few days when I am back home. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
