Am 23.07.2013 20:49, schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 14:38:17 -0400, > Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> PS: Somewhere in this discussion, it was brought up that Fedora >> infrastructure is not running on Fedora. I find that a really depressing >> state of affairs. Changing that would be a great goal, imo. > > I think making sure a Fedora fork could run on Fedora (to bootstrap) is good enough given our current resources. > Infrastructure is already short on human resources and trying to run stuff on Fedora is going to add a lot of work > (so other things will not get done) for little benefit to the project on the other hand "it your own dogfoot" may lead to *a lot* of more care in many aspects if it comes to desicisons like "delay a feature to the next release" which is not ready if the fedora ibfrastructure would have been bootstraped at it's own in times of F15 development we would have gotten systemd wirh F16 or F17 but most likely in the quality it has with F18/F19 the viewpoint of what is critical and important is a completly different one if you have to live at your own with the decisions or only your userbase which "should read the manuals", hence in many cases people of the fedora infrastructure could come to the decision that the existing manuals are to less, non existent or in some cases even wrong
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
