Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/22/2013 11:34 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:27:08 -0400, Matthew Miller
> <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Running two instances to get two sets of services has been the
>> best practice since about 1995. :)
> 
> When you have money. For hobbiests that may not always apply.

Virtualization (especially free virt in the OS, like KVM) has pretty
much trivialized that concern.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlHtUn4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6NKogCgqv+N73c7LVcz3e4kesJdQO0I
OoQAn3eat8HnuBKodbCsJ8SsMp6T6LxV
=n3eN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux