On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:51:37AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I'm a bit worried about this. We really want bundled libs to > eventually go away (for any particular bundled lib). This seems like > it could encourage permanently bundled libs. That is going to make Upstream code is full of bundled libs. We are holding back the ocean here. I think we can have greater overall impact with an embrace-and-improve approach (where we float on that ocean a little bit, to stretch the metaphor) than with a current hold-it-back-until-perfect approach. For the core distribution, and for the Fedora Commons, we should keep to the current practice. > some packages conflicting for a very long time. (And the conflicting > packages may not be providing the same service, so that you'd need > to run two instances of Fedora to get both sets of services.) Running two instances to get two sets of services has been the best practice since about 1995. :) -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel