On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Miloslav Trmač <mitr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This is a draft of the proposal I'm presenting at Flock, "An Architecture >> for a More Agile Fedora" (<http://sched.co/19ugKGM>). > (The more high-level comment.) > > This essentially explicitly gives up on the idea of "Fedora" or, > implicitly, "Linux" as a "platform"^W/"deployment target"/"ecosystem" Quite the opposite, I would say. The BSDs show that you can maintain a highly integrated small core OS with a tiny team. Android has shown it can be done on top of the Linux kernel. The traditional Linux distros are comparatively flailing at it -- throwing a ton more resources at it, badly coordinated. If Fedora moves to a tightly integrated core, and does it in a way that other distros follow, Linux could grow a small core that moves in sync with the kernel and outpaces the competition. systemd is the example here. Couple of months ago I have written about this topic here https://plus.google.com/u/0/104365545644317805353/posts/MgAeGR6Pb8p -- the way I read Matthew's proposal is that it follows the "fast moving core" goals... cheers, m -- martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first ~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
