On 07/18/2013 12:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 17.07.13 17:50, Denys Vlasenko (dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> On 07/17/2013 05:21 PM, John.Florian@xxxxxxxx wrote: >>> >>>> From: sclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>>> This seems like such a specious argument. Maybe it made sense when >>>> we were talking about disk drives >>>> that were megabytes in size, but now we have 500 gigabyte drives >>>> usually as a minimum. >>> >>> You don't ever work with embedded systems, do you? >> >> If you are running systemd on a embedded system, you are clearly >> not concerned about saving space :) > > There are actually quite a few embedded devices running systemd these > days. Wind generators, outer space telescopes, cars, toys, quite a lot > of other stuff. We do get reports about this from time to time. Did I say systemd can't be run on an embedded device? I said that if one runs systemd on a embedded system, then this device isn't seriously resource constrained. Do you see that these two statements are not the same? > So, no snarky comments about embedded devices, please, it's entirely > inappropriate. What's inappropriate is giving instructions to others what they can, or can not say. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
