On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 22:42 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 09:17 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > >> > I'm afraid I can't agree. I like the simplicity of the model you're > >> > proposing, but from a practical point of view, there is still a commonly > >> > held perception that there is a 'product' called Fedora which is > >> > basically composed of what you get if you go to get.fedoraproject.org, > >> > download one of the things we push at you there, and install it. > >> > Practically speaking, I believe we have to QA that 'thing called Fedora' > >> > as a whole. I don't think your model quite matches what people perceive > >> > Fedora to be. > >> > >> What's your definition of what people perceive Fedora to be? > > > > "What do we talk about when we talk about Fedora?" :) > > > > Well, we just did a major release. Go look on news.google.com for > > "Fedora 19", or search for "Fedora 19 review", or just poke through a > > few popular tech sites and forums. > > > > What do people do when they want to 'try Fedora 19'? They download the > > primary image on the download page, which is the desktop live, and run > > it. This is what they've _always_ done. > > Hmm I wouldn't be surprised if we had more Fedora users running on > cloud instances now than we do on the desktop but there's no way to > tell really. Might be the sites I'm reading, but I have yet to see a single post anywhere even mentioning the cloud image, while I've replied to dozens of posts of people testing the desktop live. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
