Re: F20 System Wide Change: Change Packaging Guidelines to discourage requires into /bin and /sbin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:25:37PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 16.07.2013 21:18, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
> > <nod>  I think that the best course of action would to rethink UsrMove as
> > UsrMerge which I would then take to the rest of the FPC as getting rid of
> > the prohibition on packages listing /bin, /sbin/ lib, /lib64 as the location
> > in the file.  The caveats of package maintainers having to think in terms of
> > the dependencies and canonical locations instead of whether it was symlinked
> > on the path on their own system would still apply.
> > 
> > Posible alternatives for FPC to consider if FESCo decides we really want to
> > think in terms of /usr/{bin,sbin,[..]} being the canonical correct place and
> > in the distant future, /bin might go away:
> > 
> > * Have package maintainers patch upstreams to use /usr/{bin,lib,[..]}
> > instead of /{bin,lib[...]} (for instance, shebang lines)
> 
> if UsrMove would have been planned properly RPM/rpmbuild would
> have the capabilities ot fix this at the buildtime instead
> insist that anybody rewrites and patches anything
> 
This is not a rpm or rpmbuild issue.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpUaTSZcc9XG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux