On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 21:50 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 16.07.2013 21:45, schrieb John.Florian@xxxxxxxx: > >> From: h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> i am *strictly* against all this truncate and autopaging and for > >> me "GIT does the same" is no argument - a mistake is not better > >> because others do the same............. > >> > >> if i want paging i do " | less" or " | more" > >> *this* is the unix way of work > >> > >> but who am i............... > >> > > While I'm no more important than the next guy, I'll defend the auto-pager feature of both git and journalctl. I > > love it, in fact. I'm no stranger to very long pipelines and sub-shells but I see nothing but benefit in not > > having to add "| less" routinely to things that are UI in nature. These auto-pagers get out of the way immediately > > if you need a pipeline, so what's the harm? In fact, you can still "journalctl | less" or the like if you really > > want to. > > you could also do > alias journalctl="journalctl | less" > to achive the same > > hence my konsole has scrollbars, i do not like autopaging and whatever > is not pure unix because there are mechs to achieve whatever you need > and with GIt and systemctl/journalctl whe have a inconsistent behavior > > in any case *truncate* outputs is a absolutely no-go > > the ordinary user does not look at all this things and the > advanced which have a reson to look get stripped informations alias journalctl='journalctl --no-pager' an live happy Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
