On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:24:05PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:14:24PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > I was working on adding 2 more SOC's for packagers earlier this week. > >> > > >> > I wanted to see how much call there was for these... should I try and > >> > make them accessable by all packagers? Or just have a group and > >> > interested people could be added to that group? > >> > >> I for one would like to have access to some ARM systems for trying > >> things out. At least one for each arch that's a candidate to become > >> primary would be nice. > > > > I appreciate that some people cannot or don't want to buy hardware, > > but if you did have roughly $300 available, then you should probably > > get the Oct 2012 Samsung Chromebook or the Arndale development board. > > The Chromebook has the advantage IMHO that it's a decent netbook. > > $45 will get your a beaglebone which the last of the core support has > landed in 3.11 and I'm testing the kernel now and there should be a > F-19 remix soon... But no hardware virtualization right? I think the minimum we should target for Fedora development machines is whatever supports hardware virtualization, which is A-15 IIRC. However a $45 option *is* good for people on limited budgets or people who want to play with ARM but don't care about virtualization. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
