On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:14:24PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I was working on adding 2 more SOC's for packagers earlier this week. > > > > I wanted to see how much call there was for these... should I try and > > make them accessable by all packagers? Or just have a group and > > interested people could be added to that group? > > I for one would like to have access to some ARM systems for trying > things out. At least one for each arch that's a candidate to become > primary would be nice. I appreciate that some people cannot or don't want to buy hardware, but if you did have roughly $300 available, then you should probably get the Oct 2012 Samsung Chromebook or the Arndale development board. The Chromebook has the advantage IMHO that it's a decent netbook. For more hardware options see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_ARM_Hardware Don't get an R-Pi. Not anything against it, just that it's a very old and obsolete variant of the ARM architecture, and no longer supported in Fedora (since Fedora 19 IIRC). Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
