On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 18:08 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 07/10/2013 02:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > No. The release blocking desktops are KDE and GNOME. This is stated in > > the preamble of all release criteria pages, for lack of anywhere better > > to state it. > > If we were only proposing headless ARM servers for primary how would > these criteria apply? The changes to the build system would be the same > with our without these desktops in either case. Note I'm not asking > Adam specifically; it's a question for the room. As I said elsewhere in the thread, the criteria should be subsidiary to the primary arch designation. If we decide we want to take ARM as a primary arch in any form in which the current release criteria don't apply, we should amend the release criteria. In context I was just providing some background information: as the criteria currently stand, KDE and GNOME are the release blocking desktops. (Technically that in itself isn't really an aspect of the release criteria; it's Fedora status quo that predates the current form of the release validation process). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
