On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 18:01 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 07/10/2013 05:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 09:46 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:36:39 +0100 > >> Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> wrote: > >> > >> ...snip... > >> > >>>> test instances for maintainers as described here: > >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers > >>> > >>> I've never seen the above before. > >>> > >>> There's instances available to QA > >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/qa-machines > >> > >> I was working on adding 2 more SOC's for packagers earlier this week. > >> > >> I wanted to see how much call there was for these... should I try and > >> make them accessable by all packagers? Or just have a group and > >> interested people could be added to that group? > > > > They're probably useful for update testing, but I don't think they're > > much use for release validation, since that generally equates to testing > > deployment, which you can't really do from an ssh session. > > > > FWIW I'll be proposing (likely tomorrow) an F20 feature/change for ARM virt on > x86, which will track the missing libvirt/virt-manager/etc bits needed to run > Fedora ARM in a VM on x86 using standard tools. Hopefully that helps here. It most DEFINITELY would, assuming it will perform at least acceptably (not askin' for miracles, but YKWIM). Thanks muchly. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
