On 07/10/2013 05:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 09:46 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:36:39 +0100 >> Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >> >> ...snip... >> >>>> test instances for maintainers as described here: >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers >>> >>> I've never seen the above before. >>> >>> There's instances available to QA >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/qa-machines >> >> I was working on adding 2 more SOC's for packagers earlier this week. >> >> I wanted to see how much call there was for these... should I try and >> make them accessable by all packagers? Or just have a group and >> interested people could be added to that group? > > They're probably useful for update testing, but I don't think they're > much use for release validation, since that generally equates to testing > deployment, which you can't really do from an ssh session. > FWIW I'll be proposing (likely tomorrow) an F20 feature/change for ARM virt on x86, which will track the missing libvirt/virt-manager/etc bits needed to run Fedora ARM in a VM on x86 using standard tools. Hopefully that helps here. - Cole -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
