On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:00:27PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture = >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary >> > >> > How many F19 packages currently fail to build (or are excluded but >> > shouldn't be) on ARM? How do we stand against the other items of >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements >> > ? >> >> I'm particularly curious about the developer resources and release >> criteria items. The proposal calls out one kernel maintainer, which >> is great, but doesn't expand on how many others are doing ARM work. >> Is the ARM team on the hook to go through all of the existing QA >> criteria on ARM platforms and do they have enough resources to do >> this? >> > > I wouldn't limit the things I'm willing to fix to the kernel. I'll > happily look into all ARM FTBFS. There's a number of people working on this but ultimately like all problems we can handle as much as possible but we also need assistance by the package maintainers themselves. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
