On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:00:27PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture = > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary > > > > How many F19 packages currently fail to build (or are excluded but > > shouldn't be) on ARM? How do we stand against the other items of > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements > > ? > > I'm particularly curious about the developer resources and release > criteria items. The proposal calls out one kernel maintainer, which > is great, but doesn't expand on how many others are doing ARM work. > Is the ARM team on the hook to go through all of the existing QA > criteria on ARM platforms and do they have enough resources to do > this? > I wouldn't limit the things I'm willing to fix to the kernel. I'll happily look into all ARM FTBFS. --Kyle -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
