On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 21.06.2013 23:52, schrieb drago01: >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Am 21.06.2013 17:54, schrieb Brendan Long: >>>> On 06/20/2013 05:11 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> /etc/init.d/ should be empty, with wrappers or not, on a >>>>> distribution switching to systemd - period >>>> >>>> Why? >>> >>> *why not* >>> >>> is fedora now using systemd or sysv-init? >>> in my life i make descisions and follow them straight >> >> That's a non argument really. Do the scripts work or not? They do so >> there is no urgent need to convert them asap > > with your argumentation *a lot* of replacements in the last few > years had no need to be done because things worked and still > would work fine and it would have saved a lot of trouble No that's not what I wrote. > define *urgent* In this context define is "critical enough to block a release for". > systemd was introduced with F15, now we have F19 in a foew weeks > these are *four* major upgrades - wehn do *you* think is time > to finish things started with F15? If it is that important to you ... how about sending patches? ;) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
