On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 14:43 +0200, drago01 wrote: > >> Excuse my cynicism here but this would also require some change to the > >> QA process itself and what are blockers and what are not and the "nice > >> to have" process which should be renamed "we won't hold our breath". > > > > I don't really see any special place for QA in reviewing design > > decisions. I've said it before, but my opinion is that the job of QA is > > to determine whether things are working as intended, not to decide what > > the intentions should be. > > No but if QA had adopted the "keyboard layouts must work" criterion > that I have proposed multiple times > the anaconda maintainers would have to spent their time on fixing the > real issue rather than papering over > it in such obscure ways. Nope. Current anaconda would pass any such criterion. It lets you pick a keyboard layout, and picking a keyboard layout works. I don't think a "there must be a keyboard layout indicator in anaconda" criterion would get accepted. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
