Re: ABRT, Faf and current state of bug reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/23/2013 03:27 PM, Richard Marko wrote:
This allows us to get accurate statistics of crashing applications while
not forcing every user to report to bugzilla. This is a trade-off
between getting accurate statistics and quality of the reports as
automated reports are anonymous which is also the reason why they can't
contain full backtrace with data.

To clarify, is it so that from now on we'll always get (less detailed) "[faf]" bugzilla issues instead of the old (more detailed) "[abrt]" ones, or does that depend on how the user experiencing a crash interacts with ABRT?

Stephan
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux