On 24 Apr 2013 01:22, "Adam Williamson" <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 22/04/13 10:55 AM, Rave it wrote:
>>
>> Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 +0000
>> schrieb devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>> For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout
>> having more infomation what the user did if abrt would trigered.
>> Maybe thy played arround without knowledge about the programm and did
>> wrong things?
>> Better the abrt guys forced the user to write what they did if abrt
>> trigger a alarm.
>> For me a bug whithout a comment isn't a bug.
>> And honestly, if i get such bugs without a comment, i asked the user
>> friendly what they did.
>> In case of 50% i get no answer.
>
>
> abrt catches *crashes*. Code should really never crash. Even if the user 'did something wrong', that's not an excuse for crashing. You might need more info on what the users did in some cases to diagnose the crash, but a crash is basically always a bug.
Yep, I'd agree on that but in the case of something like a crash in cogl its usually the driver and not cogl and that needs information from the user and is useless without it.
Peter
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
