Re: Keeping old versions of packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 09.04.2013 17:02, schrieb Richard Hughes:
> On 9 April 2013 13:48, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> if i want monthly pacthdays i use Microsoft or Oracle
> 
> Not at all. Patchdays make perfect sense for planning
> reboots/downtime/maintenance and that kind of thing.

there where i need this test-machines and internal repos exists
but i do NOT need anybody to hold back updates for me

>> you can hardly classify which bug is for which user critical!
> 
> Sure you can, Red Hat does it for updates in RHEL, and you just have
> to define what the terms mean. 90% of the updates I'm looking at right
> now for F18 are really not important at all. Spec file fixups, new
> versions without bugfixes, updated artwork; that can all wait until a
> certain point in the month

but Fedora IS NOT RHEL
if you want the RHEL way use it

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux