Am 09.04.2013 14:27, schrieb Matthew Miller: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: >> I'm wondering what the interest would be in keeping packages >> referenced in metadata on the mirrors for say a month? We'd probably >> need a separate fedora-security repo too that's designed to be kept >> small enough so that metadata checks every day would be not costly in >> terms of bandwidth and time. >> If anyone is interested in doing this, you'd be awesome. Thanks. > > I've heard of a plan in development about batching non-critical updates into > monthly sets. It seems like these two things could go together a terrible idea for a distribution with a new release all 6 months if i want monthly pacthdays i use Microsoft or Oracle you can hardly classify which bug is for which user critical! depends often on the workload and currect jobs and the cirtical apllication wheer a bug will hurt you much may change from project to project there are months where i would not care if LibreOffice does not start at all and there are weeks where i need it all day long
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
