Re: package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2013-04-03, Miloslav Trmač <mitr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "How does (yum update) work with multiple installed versions?"
>
> We already can install simultaneously 25 different RPMs with the same
> %{name}.  But what does (yum uprade) do when the repositories one month
> later contain 35 different RPMs with that name, none matching the original
> 25?
>
Those within same branch/slot will be updated to latest in the
branch/slot.

That's roughly what I was talking about two mails earlier, except that I called it "API identifier", and AFAICS there is no reasonable way to assign an API identifier that would make sense (roughly because whether an API identifier makes sense depends on packages that _require_ the identifier, not on the package that _provides_ it, so it is not a local property).
    Mirek

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux