Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?
From: Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:58:46 -0400
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <514214D4.3030406@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Attachment: binvkBlqz1MCV.bin
Description: application/pgp-encrypted

Attachment: msg.asc
Description: Binary data

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

References:
- Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?
  - From: Daniel J Walsh
- Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?
  - From: yersinia
- Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?
  - From: Daniel J Walsh
- Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?
  - From: Casey Dahlin
- Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?
  - From: Daniel J Walsh