Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

sysctl -a | grep protected
fs.protected_hardlinks = 0
fs.protected_symlinks = 0
Here some more info for this apparent regression http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/kernel/commit/?id=561ec64ae67ef25cac8d72bb9c4bfc955edfd415

 Best

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux