Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:08:48AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Well I believe Ubunto has been using this feature for years and maybe we
> should consider turning it on via systemd or a unit file.  The breakage of AFD
> is not a legitimate reason for Fedora to turn it off.

Why not add an LSM call, security_follow_restricted_link()? Then you could ship
this protection with SELinux policy, and even turn it off per-label if specific
applications need the old behavior.

--CJD
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux