Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Mathieu Bridon
<bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 15:14 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> 在 2013-3-12 PM3:03,"Tomasz Torcz" <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>写道:
>>
>> >   This sounds like updates that SHOULDN'T be pushed. If update has no
>> > changes worth mentioning, it is trivial - trivial updates should not be
>> pushed.
>>
>> If upstream release a minor bug fix version, what should we do?
>>
>>
>> 在 2013-3-12 PM3:03,"Tomasz Torcz" <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>写道:
>>
>> >   This sounds like updates that SHOULDN'T be pushed. If update has
>> no
>> > changes worth mentioning, it is trivial - trivial updates should not
>> be pushed.
>>
>> If upstream release a minor bug fix version, what should we do?
>
> Then the update is not trivial, and you know what to put in the update
> notes: just talk about this bug fix.
>
>
> --
> Mathieu
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Forget it. There is such a double standard here and exceptions to many
rules. This is a worthless conversation.

Good on ya if you put in the extra effort.

Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux