On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Perhaps the update policy should have a guideline on the minimum amount > of information required in this description. E.g. "update to latest > upstream version" might be a perfectly acceptable description for Fedora > given the fast pace of updates, but I don't think users should ever be > seeing "no update information available" and especially not "here is > where you give an explanation of your update." (And I've seen this one > multiple times within the past couple of weeks.) I tend to agree here. That being said, most of my package updates are something along the lines of "Update to upstream 2.5 release" -- would you find that descriptive enough, or still lacking in detail? -- Jared Smith -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
