On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 12:06 -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Michael Catanzaro > <mike.catanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Perhaps the update policy should have a guideline on the minimum amount > > of information required in this description. E.g. "update to latest > > upstream version" might be a perfectly acceptable description for Fedora > > given the fast pace of updates, but I don't think users should ever be > > seeing "no update information available" and especially not "here is > > where you give an explanation of your update." (And I've seen this one > > multiple times within the past couple of weeks.) > > I tend to agree here. That being said, most of my package updates are > something along the lines of "Update to upstream 2.5 release" -- would > you find that descriptive enough, or still lacking in detail? Perhaps add a link tot he upstream changelog, provided it is accessible on the web? (e.g a wiki page, in their VCS viewer, etc...) -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
