----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Michael Catanzaro > <mike.catanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Perhaps the update policy should have a guideline on the minimum > > amount > > of information required in this description. E.g. "update to latest > > upstream version" might be a perfectly acceptable description for > > Fedora > > given the fast pace of updates, but I don't think users should ever > > be > > seeing "no update information available" and especially not "here > > is > > where you give an explanation of your update." (And I've seen this > > one > > multiple times within the past couple of weeks.) > > I tend to agree here. That being said, most of my package updates > are > something along the lines of "Update to upstream 2.5 release" -- > would > you find that descriptive enough, or still lacking in detail? >From the time, Kevin sent me a message in a style of "One more such update description and I'll will come to Brno to k*ll you" I'm trying to provide better description. But it really depends on quality of upstream Changelogs. Sometimes it's just really hard to write more than "update to latest upstream version x.y" :( Jaroslav > -- > Jared Smith > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
