Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/07/2013 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> I don't know for sure, but I'm not aware of any, sadly. A lot of the
>> discussion happened in a big free-for-all that ensued from the flaming
>> wreckage of spot's talk on a proposed new release cycle (not spot's fault,
>> but the discussion of his proposal very rapidly mutated into a wide-ranging,
>> 'what do we want to change in Fedora?' discussion that lasted for a few
>> hours.) I don't think anyone was recording at that point. I think some
>> people wrote blog posts about it, though.
>
> Unfortunately,  this leaves people who haven't attended the FUDCon
> disconnected from the discussions and you only get very distilled
> impressions.  Recording conversations like this is fairly important

Notes were collected at the end and this thread began with I believe a
fair representation of the outcome of the discussion and it was signed
off on by the list of people included in the original post to which I
am happy to add my name as someone who was present for most of the
discussion. Of course it was fully expected there would be extensive
discussion here about the idea.

John
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux