Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 07:48 -0500, Mark Bidewell wrote:

> Are there any records of these FUDCon discussions? Creating defined
> core of functionality seems like it could solve several problems.  I
> would be curious as to what ideas we proposed on that.

I don't know for sure, but I'm not aware of any, sadly. A lot of the
discussion happened in a big free-for-all that ensued from the flaming
wreckage of spot's talk on a proposed new release cycle (not spot's
fault, but the discussion of his proposal very rapidly mutated into a
wide-ranging, 'what do we want to change in Fedora?' discussion that
lasted for a few hours.) I don't think anyone was recording at that
point. I think some people wrote blog posts about it, though.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux