Am 18.02.2013 17:23, schrieb James Hogarth: > You keep bringing up the bump needed in 5.5.10 but that's out of context for this - anyone running against less > than 5.5.10 would not be relevant to this discussion (as they'd have a similar issue updating to any MySql release > that is 5.5.10 or higher) and that would not be a F18 to F19 upgrade... no i bring this up as example as EXAMPLE that "are binary compatible" is not guranteed over the lifecycle of F19, in this context i do not think one second about F18 becasue it is out of context > otherwise this is just a matter of discussion outside of the scope of the change and > based solely in the hypothetical expierience with fedora features, promises and what happens until release * anaconda in F18 * systemd in F15 which was NOT ready for a release and supressed even warnings and errors to make it hard to impossible to debug native units and in F17 all this for F15/f16 needed messages started to appear in /var/log/messages to only name two of them forgive me but after F15-F18 i do not buy promises of fedora features because they always made BEFORE the work and real-life tests instead prepare things, look if they are doable and which side-effects they have and AFTER THAT make a feature proposal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
