Il giorno dom, 17/02/2013 alle 17.32 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil ha scritto: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Christoph Wickert > <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 16:12 -0500 schrieb Orcan Ogetbil: > >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > >> > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: > >> >> Since then I found a page that describes the Fedora 16 EOL Closure > >> >> procedure: > >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora18#Fedora_16_EOL_Closure > >> >> > >> >> It says that the bugs with "version == Fedora 16" and "status != CLOSED" > >> >> are subject to automatic closure. Could you give an example of a bug > >> >> that you described? > >> > > >> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2359/lxpanel-0.5.12-1.fc18 > >> > and > >> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2359/lxpanel-0.5.12-1.fc17 > >> > fix several bugs, among them two very old and annoying ones: > >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782431 and > >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785906 > >> > > >> > As you can see the bugs were already ON_QA before they were closed > >> > WONTFIX. > >> > > >> > >> But those are bugs filed against Fedora 16. Will Fedora 16 receive the > >> fix at this point? No. Hence WONTFIX is correct. > > > > No it's not. The bug is resolved in a later release of Fedora, thus > > CURRENTRELEASE or NEXTRELEASE are correct. WONTFIX implies it was not > > fixed it all. > > > > Hmm, I always interpreted that the "RELEASE" in CURRENTRELEASE or > NEXTRELEASE refers to the Release tag of the corresponding package, > and not to the Fedora release version. The bug header looks like this > > Product: Fedora > Component: lxpanel > Version(s): 16 > Platform: x86_64 > > In my interpretation, I would _not_ close this bug if I fix it only > - for another product than "Fedora" , e.g. for "RHEL". RHEL might > suffer from the same bug as well, but this complaint was for Fedora. > We cannot ignore Fedora. > - for another component. It does not make sense to fix a kernel bug > and close this bug report, does it? > - for another platform. If the bug is filed for i686 and my fix only > fixes x86_64, my fix is not related to this bug report. (Of course the > fix might fix both i686 and x86_64, in which case the bug can be > closed.) > - for another Fedora version. I believe the bug is Fedora version > specific (else why do we have a Version tag?). If a bug is filed for > version 16, it is for version 16. Other versions might also have the > same bug, but this is irrelevant from the bug report's perspective. > > Your interpretation treats everything the same but the "Version" part > differently. Any particular reason? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#CLOSED Best, Nicola -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
