Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 16:12 -0500 schrieb Orcan Ogetbil: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: > >> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > >> > > >> > I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even > >> > though there were pending updates for F17 and F18 to fix them. As a > >> > result, the bugs are now closed WONTFIX even they were or are going to > >> > be fixed. > >> > >> What you describe is another example of strange behavior of the Fedora > >> EOL Closure script. > >> I discovered two related problems that I described three days ago: > >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178649.html > >> > >> Since then I found a page that describes the Fedora 16 EOL Closure > >> procedure: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora18#Fedora_16_EOL_Closure > >> > >> It says that the bugs with "version == Fedora 16" and "status != CLOSED" > >> are subject to automatic closure. Could you give an example of a bug > >> that you described? > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2359/lxpanel-0.5.12-1.fc18 > > and > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2359/lxpanel-0.5.12-1.fc17 > > fix several bugs, among them two very old and annoying ones: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782431 and > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785906 > > > > As you can see the bugs were already ON_QA before they were closed > > WONTFIX. > > > > But those are bugs filed against Fedora 16. Will Fedora 16 receive the > fix at this point? No. Hence WONTFIX is correct. No it's not. The bug is resolved in a later release of Fedora, thus CURRENTRELEASE or NEXTRELEASE are correct. WONTFIX implies it was not fixed it all. > Either the person who filed the bug, or the assignee could have bumped > the bug's Fedora version in the given timeframe, but they did not. I > think the 28 day period was sufficient amount of time to react. I agree, but I don't think we can rely on the bug reporters, nor on the maintainers. Therefor I suggest to not mass close bugs which are already ON_QA, in fact, that's what the bugzappers documentation says, too. Best regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
