Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > > I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even > > though there were pending updates for F17 and F18 to fix them. As a > > result, the bugs are now closed WONTFIX even they were or are going to > > be fixed. > > What you describe is another example of strange behavior of the Fedora > EOL Closure script. > I discovered two related problems that I described three days ago: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178649.html > > Since then I found a page that describes the Fedora 16 EOL Closure > procedure: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora18#Fedora_16_EOL_Closure > > It says that the bugs with "version == Fedora 16" and "status != CLOSED" > are subject to automatic closure. Could you give an example of a bug > that you described? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2359/lxpanel-0.5.12-1.fc18 and https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2359/lxpanel-0.5.12-1.fc17 fix several bugs, among them two very old and annoying ones: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782431 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785906 As you can see the bugs were already ON_QA before they were closed WONTFIX. Kind regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
