On 02/17/2013 03:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: >> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: >>> I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even >>> though there were pending updates for F17 and F18 to fix them. As a >>> result, the bugs are now closed WONTFIX even they were or are going to >>> be fixed. >> What you describe is another example of strange behavior of the Fedora >> EOL Closure script. >> I discovered two related problems that I described three days ago: >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178649.html >> >> Since then I found a page that describes the Fedora 16 EOL Closure >> procedure: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora18#Fedora_16_EOL_Closure >> >> It says that the bugs with "version == Fedora 16" and "status != CLOSED" >> are subject to automatic closure. Could you give an example of a bug >> that you described? > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2359/lxpanel-0.5.12-1.fc18 > and > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2359/lxpanel-0.5.12-1.fc17 > fix several bugs, among them two very old and annoying ones: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782431 and > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785906 > > As you can see the bugs were already ON_QA before they were closed > WONTFIX. > > Kind regards, > Christoph > I agree here. A number of my bugs just got closed and they are still valid and should have been moved to next version by someone who had authority to do it. . -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
