Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates
From: Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:33:36 +0800
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAA55FSMFvuRWpxuSt-UN4EvA8eqqDnQ8tkCr3Fx=Aqz2CiUreA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

NEXTRELEASE should be great.

28 days is not enough...Somebody never subscribe devel ,even their email address is invalid.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates
  - From: Jaroslav Reznik
- Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates
  - From: Florian Weimer

References:
- Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates
  - From: Christoph Wickert
- Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates
  - From: Tadej Janež
- Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates
  - From: Christoph Wickert
- Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates
  - From: Orcan Ogetbil
- Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates
  - From: Christoph Wickert
- Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates
  - From: Orcan Ogetbil