Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/13/2013 02:16 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
I for one would not want to find out that my mysql install would have
been replaced with mariadb on upgrade ( or visa versa )

The discussion already started several weeks ago but we still need any feedback. What are you particular concerns?

AFAIK, admins usually don't like this change because they are worried of:
1) different name
2) the upgrade
3) different API/ABI
4) more bugs

However, these are not the issues we should worried, because:
1) only package name is different; the structure and content of rpms and file names are the same as in mysql
2) no special steps need to be done, it's really drop-in replacement
3) API/ABI is preserved when comparing mysql-5.5 and mariadb-5.5
4) the opposite is true -- several bugs are fixed in mariadb and there are much more test cases; just try google to find admin's experiences with mariadb: you'll usually find "more stable and faster" answers. At least I did.

So again, if you have some concrete concerns, let us know, please.

Honza
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux