James Hogarth wrote: > Right now there's no roadmap for 4.0 - no milestone dates, alpha dates or > beta dates... The best that exists for this is a nightly snapshot from > trunk covered in caveats about how unstable it's likely to be. > > The openoffice.org wiki doesn't even mention 3.4 much less future plans > for 4.0 on it's features page! > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Features > > Could you have a chat with Rob Weir to clarify IBM's timeline for the 4.0 > package and provide some hard milestone dates rather than the current > vague "April 2013" ? > > Annoyingly the AOO thread has split in my email client by I agree the > discussion about the IBM Symphony dump ( licensing concerns as out of > scope given that won't be packaged and all code will be review for license > whilst being merged to AOO however this inject of proprietary code as > opposed to the open tested code of 3.4.1 on a tight timeline is I would > submit a concern as to the likelihood of bugs and slippage from the > current vague date. AOO really seems to have degenerated into IBM's private playground. (No wonder, they're the only ones who benefit from the braindead non-copyleft licensing.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
