> Unlike pulseaudio (in the above linked thread), AOO is > end-user GUI application, not a library/daemon/sound-server/whatever > used to get the wanted sound to your headphones (that by design > interferes with anything else trying to do the same) ;-) By adding AOO > we're not breaking some third app, we might break LO and that's exactly > what I consider critical not to do. Is it doable? Are there people > willing and able to do that? If yes, sure, let them. It is irrelevant whether it is a daemon or a GUI application. The main point is that you are confusing users and also developers. Why the hell should a random user have to choose from half a dozen seemingly similar programs when the information for making an educated choice is so hard to obtain, if at all it can be obtained? Whether it is editing a document or listening to audio, it is all about using some piece of software to get something done. It is not about spending loads of time to make the choice. As for developers, why would they have to deal with bug reports filed against the wrong component (AOO vs LO)? Cheers, Debarshi -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar
Attachment:
pgplrnZC2NkDe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
