On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:16:36AM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > But the fact that the packages conflict should stand in the way. > > > We don't have any guidelines that forbids it. > > Just a note for people searching the mailing list later: We do have Guidelines that prohibit Conflicts in many cases: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts However, the FPC recently (in the last year) added this general exception: " However, if neither upstream is willing to rename the binaries to resolve the conflict, AND the binaries are not viable candidates for alternatives or environment modules (incompatible runtimes), as long as there are no clear cases for both packages to be installed simultaneously, explicit Conflicts are permitted at the packager's discretion. Both packages must carry Conflicts in this case." which this case seems to fall under. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpy87usmCz33.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
